Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Texas "Open Carry" Petition

Anybody who has ever spent much time immersed in the gun culture will quickly discover that there are certain debate topics that come up again and again. One of these is the "open carry versus concealed carry" debate. (Do a Google search for online forums if you are interested in learning the pros and cons of “open carry”.) Since "open carry" isn't generally a legal option in Texas, I don't have an opinion one way or the other on it. But, that may change if the creators of this online petition have anything to say about it. I intend to sign it for the simple reason that it increases liberty -which I am always in favor of. Also, here is the Dallas Morning News article where I learned about this.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Going Postal: No Gun Required

Two stories in the news interest me today. First, a man here in the US went on an, er, "beating-spree", bludgeoning at least eight people to death in Illinois. (Chicago Illinois is well-known for its strict gun control laws.) Meanwhile, in Israel, a man went on an, er, "bulldozing spree", and killed 3 people with a bulldozer before someone in civilian clothing jumped aboard and shot him in the head. A lot of Israelis exercise their right to keep and bear arms, so it would be no surprise if a civilian had a gun with him. This is why restrictions on gun ownership are a waste of time, and can actually cause more damage when people decide to "go Postal".

Texas Pledge Briefs

My client David Croft has posted some of the briefs in the Texas Pledge case, which is a challenge to the insertion of the language "under god" into the Texas State Pledge on the grounds that it violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Public school children are required, absent a note from their parents, to recite the Texas State Pledge prior to beginning school. (Yes, Texas has its own pledge of allegiance.)

I wanted to mention this because I am, quite frankly, more proud of my work on the Texas Pledge and Texas Moment of Silence cases than of anything I have ever done. I may never get to see laissez faire capitalism, which I think will require broad societal support in order to elect the right politicians to the legislature, but I will always try to do what I can, as one person, to ensure that America doesn't become more socialist, or, possibly worse, backslide into medieval theocracy.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

It Is So Ordered

I will proably have more to say about this later, but here is the opinion holding that the Second Amendment is an individual right (duh).

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Pigeons Terminated

There is a fundamental fact of reality that distinguishes how one should deal with other human beings versus how one should deal with other entities. This distinction is the human capacity for thought. A human being can be persuaded, and this should be how one should initially try to deal with other human beings. Unlike a human being, a force of nature, such as a hurricane or a meteorite cannot be reasoned with. The only way to deal with non-human entities is with force. This includes the lower animals which do not possess the capacity of reason. Although it is possible that someday we will encounter a non-human with the capacity of reason, or, perhaps, even have sufficient evidence to suggest that some currently-known non-human organism possesses such a capacity (that's doubtful), human beings are the only currently known rational being. This fact means that an animal consciousness is more like a hurricane or other non-volitional entity, and must be dealt with by means of force. Just as a non-rational body of water can be diverted or dammed if it is inconvenient for human beings, so too can an animal be destroyed if it is inconvenient for human beings. It is with this in mind that I read with some amusement about the fretting of "animal rights" activists over the destruction of some pigeons at a tennis tournament in Great Britain. To me, this is like fretting over the damming of a river or, if we possessed the technology, the destruction of a hurricane headed towards one of our major cities.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

A Good Example of Why You Never Consent To A Police Search

I have a blanket policy when it comes to the police: I don't consent to any search. If stopped by a cop, I don't say anything, other than "Am I free to go?", if not, I ask for my lawyer and stop talking. It doesn't matter how innocent I think I am. How do I know for certain that somebody hasn't planted or accidentally dropped contraband in my car or house? How do I know that the cop won't try to plant contraband? Yes, it does happen -remember the fake drugs scandal in Dallas? Anybody who thinks cops are more ethical or moral than the general population is a fool.

This article presents another facet of why you shouldn't voluntarily cooperate with law enforcement. In this case, a man was fired from his job and faced prosecution for possession of child pornography, all because his laptop had a virus on it that caused it to download child pornography off the Internet. If you consent to a search of your computer, you may end up in prison and branded as a sexual predator for life, when you are, in fact, 100% innocent.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Perry To Run in 2010: Don't Let It Happen!

I think Rick Perry is the poster boy for everything that is bad about the conservatives here in Texas. (Bush is the obvious candidate nationally.) Perry believes that non-Christians are going to hell when they die. In my personal life, my basic “litmus test” for a “good Christian” versus a “bad Christian” is whether they believe non-believers are going to hell –I won’t associate with the later type of Christian. This type of “you’re going straight to hell” Christian is essentially saying that only by rejecting man’s life and reason can you be saved when you die. He is setting up a direct contradiction between the requirements of this life and his religion, which I regard as a morally evil position (by the standard of man’s life). Furthermore, politically, Perry seems to care very little about private property rights and freedom of contract, but he vigorously pushes the conservative religious agenda –which is all they really care about.
Now, believing that he hasn't done enough to push Texas towards theocracy, Perry will be running for Governor again in 2010. This article also notes that Kay Bailey Hutchison is considering running against him in their party’s primary. A little Internet research revealed that she has a better record on abortion and stem cell research, which means I’d feel safer with her as Governor. Based on this article, I think my strategy would be to vote for Hutchison in the Republican Party primary, then vote for the Democrat in the general election. The next Governor will most likely be a Republican anyway, and this will help to ensure that anybody but Perry is elected.